"Why I didn't sign the #Scala CLA". An uncharacteristically short new article.
https://failex.blogspot.com/2017/04/why-i-didnt-sign-scala-cla.html …
-
-
Replying to @S11001001
@etorreborre The reality of US copyright law is that OSS projects without some sort of legal CLA-like mechanism are problematic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak @etorreborre
I suggest some fair alternative legal mechanisms at the end of my post, with which to provide these assurances.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @S11001001 @etorreborre
Selenium's is basically a CLA. It's just one with fewer clauses.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @djspiewak @etorreborre
I don't see how. The project assents to the same license as the contributor by accepting the contribution. It's symmetric.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Constantly amazed at the gullibility of Scala programmers. This nonsense is now over 10 years old. How can you still not see it?
9:29 PM - 17 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.