In fact, if it was this easy to insult you, some exposure to offense might be good for you.
Were they right that it is an insult? What are the consequences for believing it is right, "subjective"?
-
-
But in Scalaz *we* can decide what is objectively an insult. Not to forbid it, but just to identify it.
-
It was decided. Absolutely nothing is an insult. It doesn't exist. That should be clarified of course.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.