In fact, if it was this easy to insult you, some exposure to offense might be good for you.
-
-
Replying to @tomas_mikula @dibblego and
What I'm opposed to are unnecessary insults, that could have been avoided.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Who gets to decide if it is necessary? Boy bands are not necessary. Your criteria leads to slippery slope.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No one gets to decide, but everyone gets to form their own opinion.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Here is a thing. In 1990/1991 a crime of serious abuse occurred. Today it is being successfully prosecuted...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego @tomas_mikula and
...This is only possible precisely because we as a society have finally figured out this very matter of fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not following again. I think we agree that insults are not a crime. Yet not all non-crime acts are the same.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tomas_mikula @dibblego and
People get to evaluate whether an insult served a good purpose, or was unnecessary.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Was Sinead O'Connor, 1992, tearing up the pope, an insult? Did it serve a purpose? Who decides, and how?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
not familiar with this event, but people get to form their subjective opinions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The opinions were: everyone but victims of the abuse of the Catholic Church, believed it to be an insult.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.