I also wondered. reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insult insults look fun if you compare to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying
-
-
If the intended meaning was "duty to offend" as in this speech, it got lost in the brevity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtWrljX9HRA …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it is not lost if one "assume good faith [seriously]" and get to actually know the people (vs. read CoC)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Agree, but an onlooker can only judge by what was said/written, not by what might have been meant. No thoughtcrime!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sure, and so careful about inserting adverbs, and projecting other biases :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
point well taken. I had the connotation of intent with the word insult.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"intent to insult", however, is a thought crime. You cannot know my intentions, nor can I know what insults you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You cannot know what insults me, but you can try to predict and adjust your language in order to maximize profit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Why should I do such a thing? For what benefit? I am insulted by boy bands, and also eating apples. Respond.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"For what benefit?" For whatever your objective is in the conversation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Tell me about the conversation for which the benefit is "determining and managing who is insulted by what."
-
-
then throwing in likely insults might be a good strategy.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.