Feel free to delete it.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
I mean the insult part. I don't think we need to ban them but insulting people is ad hominem and a waste of time no?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @runT1ME
I believe insulting is important. I agree with this man a lot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHMoDt3nSHs#t=202 … The idea of "causing insult" is absurd.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
agree with everything he said. I just think arguing a point is more efficient than saying "no, because that person is dumb"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I like the video, but there's a difference between someone getting offended and intentionally insulting someone.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tomas_mikula @runT1ME
That adverb you inserted, intentionally, completely undermines your point. There is no such thing. Thoughtcrime.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
to me, "Bob insulted Alice" suggests intent, while "Alice was offended by what Bob said" does not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is it my bad understanding of the nuances of the language?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I also wondered. reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insult insults look fun if you compare to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullying
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If the intended meaning was "duty to offend" as in this speech, it got lost in the brevity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtWrljX9HRA …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No. It's not your misunderstanding of language. It's much more nuanced than that [doesn't fit here].
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.