Can someone who knows Scala explain this to me, maybe with Haskell syntax/ideas? It seems kinda like `forall m. Transactional m => m a`?https://twitter.com/odersky/status/806591731722493952 …
-
-
Replying to @glaebhoerl
i think
@dibblego suggested it was just the Reader monad, but i don't really understand.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mwotton
Yeah I saw that. Even if that's all it is, built-in support for the reader monad w/ bearable syntax seems potentially not nothing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @glaebhoerl @mwotton
Good discussion here https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/implicit-function-types/219/3 …. Odersky claims possible 10x perf improvement over Reader.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Which is the funnier joke.
1:41 PM - 12 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.