Well, we ask you that you please don't, because people don't like it. Where "we" is me and some others.
-
-
Replying to @candeira @puffnfresh and
I ask that open discussion and criticism on technical matters be independent of personal likes.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
You can say that JS's global-by-default scope is awful. Open criticism is fine. It's mockery that's not ok.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also, anyone can mock on their own time. Conferences can also request "please don't do it while at our conf".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why would a conference devalue itself like that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Because, in the balance, and inclusivity can be valued over mockery. Hard choice for some, not taken lightly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is a false dichotomy. It is a mistake.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
You obviously feel very strongly about this. I will be happy to hear your rants and jokes about JS privately.
@puffnfresh@marcosc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do. Yes. I am around. Others are around who feel similarly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can all get together and make JS jokes. Or, should Compose enact a "no mockery" rule, start a new conf
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We make all types of impersonal jokes & insist on an ability to do so. Already exist confs where that is OK.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.