Sadly relevant: http://blog.aurynn.com/contempt-culture … #composemelb
-
-
Replying to @damncabbage
sums it precisely. Not a good feeling, specially cause I want to learn concepts. Feel like covering up my JS stickers
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marcosc
we'd like to hear your feedback, if you'd like to chat to us
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ComposeMelb @marcosc
I suggest we add "no language shaming" to the Code of Conduct, and mention that bit at the start of next year's conf.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
if we supercede a tool, can we make that claim? Have I then 'shamed' the tool?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You can choose not to make fun of it, and by extension of people who make a living on it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I make fun of JavaScript, not people.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Well, we ask you that you please don't, because people don't like it. Where "we" is me and some others.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @candeira @puffnfresh and
I ask that open discussion and criticism on technical matters be independent of personal likes.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
You can say that JS's global-by-default scope is awful. Open criticism is fine. It's mockery that's not ok.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Why is mockery of such an impersonal thing as a programming language, not OK?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.