@mraleph @davidcrawshaw @enneff Handwaving away facts is weird to watch. Back to the point, where are these elusive benefits?
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff why are this benefits bothering you? somebody forced you to use Go and you are not happy?1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Nothing is bothering me. I just like knowing true things. Is this a true thing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff "some people find Go beneficial for their work". I think that's the truth.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Let me rephrase. Is there a measurable practical benefit that is being overlooked by the research field?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff well, that's why I asked if you know of any PLT papers doing double blind "practical benefits" PL trials1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff That's an extremely inappropriate method by which to measure in this instance. That's not how PLT works.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff well, that's because PLT is not really about people, while actual programming is a lot about actual people.3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff saying that algorithms are unrelated to mathematics because programmers use algorithms is absurd.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @irrequietus
@irrequietus@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff "programmers are productive expressing their thoughts in the type system" <- this is not math2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mraleph @irrequietus @davidcrawshaw @enneff If only you knew enough about the subject to know how funny this claim is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.