@mraleph @davidcrawshaw @enneff Possibly. In any case, it's a demonstrable fact. Not sure of your point from there. "Trials" is not it.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff my point here is that there is more to programming languages than PLT covers.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Handwaving away facts is weird to watch. Back to the point, where are these elusive benefits?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff why are this benefits bothering you? somebody forced you to use Go and you are not happy?1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Nothing is bothering me. I just like knowing true things. Is this a true thing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff "some people find Go beneficial for their work". I think that's the truth.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Let me rephrase. Is there a measurable practical benefit that is being overlooked by the research field?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff well, that's why I asked if you know of any PLT papers doing double blind "practical benefits" PL trials1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff That's an extremely inappropriate method by which to measure in this instance. That's not how PLT works.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff as soon as you understand that, you will understand why this discussion is not going anywhere.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mraleph @davidcrawshaw @enneff Yes, sure. I am totally misunderstanding that incredibly important insight that I do not share.
Makes sense
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.