@davidcrawshaw @enneff @mraleph @krarick You at least understand how this is totally uncompelling (and not even entirely true), right?
-
-
Replying to @davidcrawshaw
@davidcrawshaw@enneff@mraleph@krarick If someone today told you the benefits of bloodletting were to alleviate pain, how would you reply?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff there've been double blind experiments showing that similarly qualified devs are less productive in Go?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mraleph1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff well, we are still talking about Go ignoring "decades of programming language research", right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Possibly. In any case, it's a demonstrable fact. Not sure of your point from there. "Trials" is not it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff my point here is that there is more to programming languages than PLT covers.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Handwaving away facts is weird to watch. Back to the point, where are these elusive benefits?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff or are you just on crusade for the glory of type systems expressive enough to encode an elephant?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mraleph @davidcrawshaw @enneff In case it is unclear, I want to know of these alleged practical benefits, that never manifest into reality.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.