@davidcrawshaw @enneff @mraleph @krarick Wait a minute. That is a measurable claim. Want to actually to put to a test?
-
-
Replying to @davidcrawshaw
@davidcrawshaw@enneff@mraleph@krarick However, back to the point, where is the practical benefit of the go programming language?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidcrawshaw
@davidcrawshaw@enneff@mraleph@krarick You at least understand how this is totally uncompelling (and not even entirely true), right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidcrawshaw
@davidcrawshaw@enneff@mraleph@krarick If someone today told you the benefits of bloodletting were to alleviate pain, how would you reply?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff there've been double blind experiments showing that similarly qualified devs are less productive in Go?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mraleph
@mraleph@davidcrawshaw@enneff Demonstrating subsumption is done using mathematics, not trials. Yes, this has been done in the context.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davidcrawshaw@enneff sorry, you can't demonstrate human productivity without trials - we aren't a math abstraction.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mraleph @davidcrawshaw @enneff Are you going to say funny things at me?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.