Tony Morris

@enneff @davidcrawshaw @mraleph @krarick Last try. Genuinely keen if there is truly a practical benefit. Start where? http://i.imgur.com/n6T9wlY.png 

@dibblego @enneff @mraleph @krarick also the compilers are not good enough and I don't know how to make them better. FP leaks proc perf.

@davidcrawshaw @enneff @mraleph @krarick Wait a minute. That is a measurable claim. Want to actually to put to a test?

@dibblego @enneff @mraleph @krarick I cannot understand the perf of my code without knowing too much about ghc. The fp abstraction leaks.

@davidcrawshaw @enneff @mraleph @krarick However, back to the point, where is the practical benefit of the go programming language?

@dibblego @enneff @mraleph @krarick go: pointers, gc, readable code that does what it says, easy tooling, small spec, portable, fast enough.

@davidcrawshaw @enneff @mraleph @krarick You at least understand how this is totally uncompelling (and not even entirely true), right?

@dibblego @enneff @mraleph @krarick if those features don't interest you Go is not for you. Fortunately I find those features compelling.