.@purefn usually either for the Monad or compatibility with other APIs. Kinda silly.
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
.
@purefn this whole issue is an instance of getting equations between weaker and stronger constructions backwards.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp hmm interesting. I see what you mean. I'm curious what@dibblego thinks.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @purefn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @dibblego1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@purefn It cannot be done such that ap=(<*>)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@purefn It is a reasonable expectation. I also don't see the penalty otherwise.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
.
@dibblego@purefn but it's unlikely there's a point to a non-monoidal Validation in either and the monad instance eliminates jumping around2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp @purefn I am totally not following. Twitter is not for useful discussion ∴ shall we take it elsewhere?
4:40 PM - 22 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.