@MrMikeRodriguez @bitemyapp @leonardo_borges @cwharris No. I mean that core.typed has nothing to do with types.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris do you mean in the sense that types are about correctness and abstraction?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theleoborges
@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris Type has quite a precise definition. Core.typed is not even approximately similar.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris what definition ? Genuine question. Is it the word definition or in a PL context?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theleoborges
@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris I think TaPL does a nice job of telling us what type means.6 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris If you actually read the TaPL defn, it's clear that it includes core.typed.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @samth
@samth@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris It's less clear that it is a bait and switch.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris I'm glad you're willing to admit your statement was incorrect.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp@cwharris Yes that's exactly what I did.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@leonardo_borges@MrMikeRodriguez@bitemyapp oh cool. Did I miss the link?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@cwharris @samth @leonardo_borges @MrMikeRodriguez @bitemyapp No you didn't. I was just seeing what it's like to lack precision.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.