@dibblego @gregmcintyre Thought it was an interesting article on the subject.
-
-
Replying to @Catharz3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@Catharz It's not about whether or not you are wrong. It's what happens next that counts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@Catharz Yes it would. Try to come up with one where the statement is true. Reflect on what you just did. Laugh at yourself.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@Catharz Programming means "horse." Mathematics means "elephant." Programming is not mathematics. Win!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@Catharz Nope impossible. You definitely proved something.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre @Catharz That thing is either a) not true and so won't be a program/proof or b) true and will be a program.proof
10:50 PM - 15 Jul 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.