@copumpkin @krismicinski @psnively Yes. These are different. Like other different things. Programming remains an act of constructing proofs.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively what "proof" are you constructing when you write a rails app?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @krismicinski
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively I am wholeheartedly 100% in agreement with you, but saying all programs are proofs hurts the cause.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krismicinski
@krismicinski@copumpkin@psnively How does starting a matter of fact hurt a cause (which cause?)?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively if cause is to advocate FP saying "programs are proofs" is technically true but misleading in many situations1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krismicinski
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively because in many cases programs that many people write are proofs of nothing related to their program1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @krismicinski
@krismicinski@copumpkin@psnively That one is writing a boring proof makes it helpful to say programs are proofs so the boredom can be seen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively sure, but almost all code in the world is written in languages where the "proofs" are boring1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krismicinski
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively I think it would be *great* to change this, and I hope to, but as it stands saying programs are proofs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krismicinski
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively needs a caveat that the proof is a relatively minor lemma tantamount to the soundness of the type system1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@krismicinski @copumpkin @psnively I agree here too and would like to qualify these matters, but for the brevity of twitter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.