@psnively perhaps likely, but all of these high level phrases are sort of puzzling because their semantic content doesn't tell you much
-
-
Replying to @krismicinski
@psnively e.g., if you say "programs are proofs" what does that mean? Does it mean that if you can write rails apps then you can do proofs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krismicinski
@krismicinski@psnively See Curry-Howard Isomorphism.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @krismicinski
@krismicinski@dibblego@psnively then use Agda instead :)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @copumpkin
@copumpkin@krismicinski@psnively Haha best response. Seriously what does what it "feels like" become relevant? I ain't no homeopath.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@krismicinski@psnively writing proofs (even in Agda) definitely involves different "muscles" than those used in e.g., Haskell2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @copumpkin
@copumpkin@krismicinski@psnively Yes. These are different. Like other different things. Programming remains an act of constructing proofs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@copumpkin@psnively what "proof" are you constructing when you write a rails app?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@krismicinski @copumpkin @psnively That depends on which app. Are you suggesting there isn't one? That would be the insanity I allude to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.