Asserting that an explicit consideration of physics is not necessary to walk, doesn’t make one a physics denier (c.f., maths + programming)
-
@dibblego is the analogy is valid? you were trying to achieve something when you unknowingly “picked your bum”, and presumably achieved it
@inkytonik The analogy is to walk, while simultaneously deny the existence of physical laws that describe how you are walking.
-
-
@dibblego right, denial of this kind is loony, but walking without explicitly thinking in terms of physics is fine -
@inkytonik Studying the mechanics of your walking without appealing to established physical laws is also loony. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.