Asserting that an explicit consideration of physics is not necessary to walk, doesn’t make one a physics denier (c.f., maths + programming)
-
@dibblego I think “without knowingly” is the crux, since there are many egs of good programs where maths has not explicitly entered into it
@inkytonik I once picked my bum without knowing it. I still picked my bum though.
-
-
@dibblego is the analogy is valid? you were trying to achieve something when you unknowingly “picked your bum”, and presumably achieved it -
@inkytonik The analogy is to walk, while simultaneously deny the existence of physical laws that describe how you are walking. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.