Asserting that an explicit consideration of physics is not necessary to walk, doesn’t make one a physics denier (c.f., maths + programming)
-
@dibblego Agreed. Certainly, though, one can do quite a bit of useful programming without necessarily thinking in mathematical terms
@inkytonik Without knowingly thinking in mathematical terms, but doing so anyway. This is ultimately why denial is so insidious in practice.
-
-
@dibblego I think “without knowingly” is the crux, since there are many egs of good programs where maths has not explicitly entered into it -
@inkytonik I once picked my bum without knowing it. I still picked my bum though. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.