@andy_snow @damncabbage not a functor :(
-
-
Replying to @mwotton
@mwotton@andy_snow If you squint hard enough you could use it to map over different types with different lambdas... But yeah.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @damncabbage
@damncabbage@andy_snow same thing as with crockford's epic misunderstanding of monads.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @mwotton
@mwotton@andy_snow Haha, I just stream-crossed in IRC with that same example. I'm still getting a handle on it, but it feels very... wrong.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @damncabbage
@damncabbage I think sometimes people think there must be more to monads than there actually is, so they invent complexifications.3 replies 6 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@mwotton@damncabbage FYI the link to the Ruby code misappropriates the word functor in an anti-knowledge manner.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@mwotton@damncabbage I don't even know what that code was hoping to achieve. Tears, presumably.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gregmcintyre
@gregmcintyre@mwotton@damncabbage Yeah don't know. Just saying that the misuse of terms here is not benign.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@mwotton@damncabbage The term means one thing in maths and another in C++ already. Maybe they were using the C++ definition?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@gregmcintyre @mwotton @damncabbage The C++ definition is derived from algebra. This code uses no term that corresponds to reality.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@mwotton@damncabbage lol. <3 Nerdy zinggg.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.