@oxnrtr how do you prevent it? i.e., disallow https://gist.github.com/tpolecat/38e323101d050c91a88f …
/ @puffnfresh @propensive
-
-
Replying to @tpolecat
@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive Why would I want to prevent that? That's exactly the behavior I would implement, if it wouldn't exist.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oxnrtr
@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive Because you can achieve the same goal with less hack. It's a win that costs you nothing.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive I am curious what you folks think of http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/implicits/implicits.pdf ….1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive implicits are a known failed experiment, well before Scala. All part of the funny.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive Any pointers on the literature that elaborates on their failed status?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive See implicit in GHC. As for failed, it's more of a concluded discussion.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive I recall `@puffnfresh saying that implicits in GHC are not related at all.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@dibblego@tpolecat@propensive@puffnfresh Hey, don't confuse him! If it's in Haskell it _has_ to be absolutely perfect. :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oxnrtr
@oxnrtr@missingfaktor@dibblego@tpolecat@propensive there are quite a few extensions I stay well away from. What's the problem?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@puffnfresh @oxnrtr @missingfaktor @tpolecat @propensive It's just the straw man to continue justifying other bullshit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.