@oxnrtr @tpolecat @puffnfresh @propensive Because you can achieve the same goal with less hack. It's a win that costs you nothing.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive I am curious what you folks think of http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/implicits/implicits.pdf ….1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive implicits are a known failed experiment, well before Scala. All part of the funny.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive Any pointers on the literature that elaborates on their failed status?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@puffnfresh@propensive See implicit in GHC. As for failed, it's more of a concluded discussion.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive I recall `@puffnfresh saying that implicits in GHC are not related at all.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive@puffnfresh Damn right they are.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive@puffnfresh but the question is relevant: any pointers in literature?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mapastr
@mapastr@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive@puffnfresh You mean pointers to the similarity? Doubt it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@missingfaktor@oxnrtr@tpolecat@propensive@puffnfresh that implicits are a known failed experiment1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@mapastr @missingfaktor @oxnrtr @tpolecat @propensive @puffnfresh No I don't know if it has been written up. I doubt it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.