@bitemyapp Yes, I believe they are unnecessary extra complexity
-
-
Replying to @GabrielG439
@GabrielG439 what am I supposed to do if the empty list case isn't legal in my program?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp Use a list which indexes the length or the minimum length in the type2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GabrielG439
@GabrielG439 that's arbitrary, unprincipled, and has no real relationship to the algebra at all.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp You can do the same thing with a minimum bound on the length1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GabrielG439
@GabrielG439 again, fetishizing and focusing on the wrong things.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@GabrielG439 length is irrelevant to the algebra. It's not *real*.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp There is no substance to any of your arguments other than "You are wrong because I deem it so"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GabrielG439
@GabrielG439 not all monoids are lists…I'm extremely surprised you'd get confused by an algebraic structure vs. one representation.14 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp You can still encode the presence or absence of zero1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@GabrielG439 @bitemyapp No you can't, for this case and approximately one bazillion more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.