@djspiewak @dibblego @puffnfresh I'm not entirely sure that's decidable. ._.
-
-
Replying to @pthariensflame
@pthariensflame@dibblego@puffnfresh However, you cannot run forever without ignoring EOF. Thus, sufficient but not complete.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@dibblego@puffnfresh What if your input is piped from /bin/true? :P2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pthariensflame
@pthariensflame@dibblego@puffnfresh If you pipe from /bin/true, it would ignore EOF.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@pthariensflame@puffnfresh Unsubscribe please.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak That's because I have no time for logical fallacies.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak I assume you mean ad hominem (sp) and no, I don't think there is that fallacy.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@djspiewak I have no idea what your confusion has to do with "ad hominem" and no, I won't justify objection to your mistakes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.