@jessitron re: implicits for DI and over-use of monads - I believe I said some things along those lines to you already :-)
-
-
Replying to @dickwall
@dickwall@jessitron overuse monads? Putting one thing after another is pretty ubiquitous; most languages reduce to a semicolon or newline!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nuttycom
@nuttycom@jessitron but language support tends to bring tools like debuggers into the mix. Debugging futures, for example, can be hard2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dickwall
@dickwall@jessitron I tend to write things in M[_] rather than Future or Task. Never seem to have much debugging trouble.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nuttycom
@nuttycom@jessitron yeah - there's also the problem of clashing (competing?) monads. Then you get into transformers...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dickwall
@dickwall@nuttycom@jessitron What are you advocating as an alternative? Pretending that you don't have monads?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@runarorama @dickwall @nuttycom @jessitron This is the fallacy of false compromise.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.