Pretentious bullshit like "Clojure is in some way related to functional programming" is a pedagogical scourge.
-
-
Replying to @curious_reader
@curious_reader The context is the continued idea that Clojure is somehow related to FP, even so ridiculous to be proposed for teaching!2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp I've read you two tweet a lot some variations of "no dynamic language is fp" care to explain? cc@psnively1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @malk_zameth
@malk_zameth@bitemyapp@psnively It's humanly intractable for non-trivial adherence to FP thesis absent types. That's why you never see it.1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp@malk_zameth@psnively It's hard when most think of lisp as the parent language for all things functional3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @rickasaurus
@rickasaurus@bitemyapp@malk_zameth@psnively Saying a language is (not) functional is like saying triangles do (not) boil above 7 metres.3 replies 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@rickasaurus the problem is they think a language is functional, and the only alt. they are open to is "not functional" ..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dom_dere
@dom_dere@rickasaurus Asking whether or not a language is functional is so inane that I lament the current date and that it is still asked.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@rickasaurus What gets me is people who not only ask but then go and waste however many days to prove you can do *some* FP in it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@dom_dere @rickasaurus Well, by *some* here, you mean some trivial irrelevant nonsense, while banging on about relevance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.