Grateful for discussion @jonsterling started. I've been bummed about the mounting confusion due to modern use of "FRP".
-
-
Replying to @conal
@conal@jonsterling Do you mean the latest use of "reactive programming" in reference to confusion?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@conal@jonsterling the "reactive" thing, it turns out, is not actually "a thing".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timperrett
@timperrett@conal@jonsterling Yes I agree, though sadly, I an still in a huge minority in this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@conal@jonsterling I'm curious about how this actually started happening, as actors != functional programming.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @timperrett
@timperrett@dibblego@conal@jonsterling I think I read or saw something on this in Scala - actors not FP - does anyone have a reference?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@andrewfnewman @timperrett @conal @jonsterling You are probably thinking of two articles by @pchiusano but yeah actors are not at all FP.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.