@BrandonBloom @ambrosebs @dibblego be optimistic
-
-
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@BrandonBloom@ambrosebs@dibblego That was optimistic.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @keystonelemur
@keystonelemur@steshaw@BrandonBloom@ambrosebs Java has a reputation of implementing almost-useful ideas. I suspect impractical TCO impl.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@steshaw@BrandonBloom@ambrosebs Shortly thereafter a Guava variant to make it look pretty.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @keystonelemur
@keystonelemur@steshaw@BrandonBloom@ambrosebs Guava is crap. http://functionaljava.org2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@keystonelemur@steshaw@ambrosebs Sheesh. Talk about swimming upstream. Working with the grain produces better results.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonBloom
@BrandonBloom@keystonelemur@steshaw@ambrosebs Functional Java is the best it gets for Java. This is how we won the war against stupidity.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@BrandonBloom@steshaw@ambrosebs After a certain point, may as well go with Scala or Clojure. Nice option if you're stuck though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @keystonelemur
@keystonelemur@BrandonBloom@steshaw@ambrosebs The only point you'd use Java is if you have colleagues insane enough to think it is useful2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@keystonelemur@steshaw@ambrosebs You're preaching to the Clojure choir, but I'd take loops & ifs over that inner class madness.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BrandonBloom @keystonelemur @steshaw @ambrosebs Clojure, unfortunately, teaches you really shitty habits. Learn properly, then ask again.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.