Those who use side-effects use mocks. Those who don't use side-effects don't use mocks. Coincidence? Nope, demonstrably causal. Say it.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@rickasaurus Foes anyone doubt this? Including those who advocate mocks and message-passing?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ctford
@ctford@rickasaurus I have met many people who deny the causal link. Many still exist today.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@rickasaurus I would regard it as definitional, as an assertion that a side-effecting method has been called is what a mock is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ctford
@ctford @rickasaurus I think the argument is actually a little more subtle (and harder to recognise) than that.
2:17 PM - 2 May 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.