@runarorama please do, it's intended as one. As explanation of my false assumption: expecting the relentless parodical style of @dibblego :)
-
-
Replying to @runarorama
@runarorama@dibblego me too – with the occasional ribbing ;). Particularly appreciated a careful explanation of lenses down the pub!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@runarorama@dibblego should perhaps follow up be sayin' that Tony told me he was giving up parody as it's not that effective.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@runarorama on scala users, all the clever ones know what up. They've figured it out.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@runarorama I'd stopped reading that list long before you were banned. Read a couple of beauties later though :)...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@runarorama I was actually banned long after I finished parodying, because I did direct behaviour mirroring.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@runarorama I hadn't realised that. I had thought it was the parodying that got in strife there.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@runarorama FWIW the idiots still think it is a "Haskell vs Scala" us and them war. Fucking persecution complex must be crippling.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@runarorama that could be because there's money riding on it now - with typesafe. It's a shame to see things get conflicted1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@steshaw @runarorama There was never a goal to create a useful language for Scala. I have this inadvertent admission in email.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.