@steshaw interesting fact: similar problems exist in natural language!
-
-
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive am I exhibiting the problem with my use of natural language? That would be spooky.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive@steshaw put briefly: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1064232/haskell-overlapping-instances/1072523#1072523 …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@psygnisfive@steshaw "yeah. Num for Int. But uh…which one?"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@psygnisfive why isn't it enough to say "the Num for Int which is in scope"? If there's more than one in scope, compiler "bleats"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@bitemyapp@psygnisfive Data structures exist in different contexts, for examples sorted set if different orders are in scope.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @markhibberd
@markhibberd@bitemyapp@psygnisfive on the weekend@dibblego referred me to https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/issues/671 …, that led me to oleg's functional pearl2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @steshaw
@steshaw@jedws@markhibberd@bitemyapp@psygnisfive@dibblego Looks like an it's-wrong-because-it's-not-exactly-like-Haskell circle-jerk.7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oxnrtr
@oxnrtr@steshaw@markhibberd@bitemyapp@psygnisfive@dibblego that is the "can't see the forest for the trees" interpretation3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@jedws @oxnrtr @steshaw @markhibberd @bitemyapp @psygnisfive which is how I know that anyone proposing it, has never also used haskell.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.