I'm unsure of the value of a type system that admits nulls.
-
-
Replying to @missingfaktor
@missingfaktor Sounds like I need to try harder to see the value. :-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ctford
@ctford@missingfaktor Compromised severely and unnecessarily does not mean valueless. It is tragic though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@missingfaktor What's the rationalisation for Null being a subtype of Refs? Interop? Is this an example of unnecessary compromise?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ctford
@ctford @missingfaktor Yes, "necessary interop" is the justification. It is of course unnecessary and one example of limited imagination.
2:57 PM - 8 Apr 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.