@dibblego OK np. Just saying monads were intro'd to CS by Moggi precisely to give denotational semantics (+ eq reasoning) to mutable refs.
-
-
Replying to @takeoutweight
@dibblego Probably trying to fit too many points into a 140 char quip. I just want to suggest "impure" things can have good eq reasoning too3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @takeoutweight
@takeoutweight "$LANG/$DATATYPE/$INTERFACE is(not) pure" is as sensible as "Triangles do (not) boil at 51°C", which is incoherent.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@takeoutweight it’s not incoherent, it’s simply false. triangles *don’t* boil at 51ºC1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive@takeoutweight It's not false, not even false.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@takeoutweight sure it is. its simply just false.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@psygnisfive@takeoutweight Not all grammatically correct sentences are either true or false.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@takeoutweight that is a subject of some debate, and has been for a very long time. :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@dibblego@takeoutweight i get what you mean to say, but i think you should be a little less quick to call nonsense “$LANG is (im)pure”1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @beka_valentine
@dibblego@takeoutweight there are perfectly reasonable things people can mean by it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@psygnisfive @takeoutweight I agree, I have clarified that already.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.