Learned a new word today: Ignosticism via @dibblego. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism …. Coming up with clear, coherent definitions is generally hard.
-
-
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre@bradclow Because inventing fantasies is an essential ingredient to effective communication?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre@bradclow Not a single individual can tell me what is OOP, God, or any other load of not even potentially existing bollocks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre@bradclow The problem is not whether "love" exists or not. It's the process by which we come to decide that it does or doesn't2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @etorreborre
@etorreborre@bradclow This is not about definitions, it is about concept formation. I cannot help nominal obsession.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
.
@dibblego@etorreborre This argument is best resolved by a friendly game of Charades where we laugh at@dibblego struggle to convey OOP1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dom_dere @etorreborre Well I am not a OOeationist, but watching an OOeationist try is quite funny. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZlxBRnxzDc#t=4117 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.