Tony Morris

@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin if it is anything but multiple instances per type is outrageous, then no.

@dibblego @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin My conclusion is that having an *enforced* single instance per type is arbitrary.

@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin You appear to be under-estimating how many instances per type there really are. Because, so what?

@dibblego @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin I never stipulated an upper-bound. My point is simply that *claiming* an upper-bound of 1 is absurd

@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin That's the entire point of a TC. There are so many more implementation than you are thinking of.

@dibblego @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin Great. So why MUST it be just one?

@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin Because any other number is reductio ad absurdum.

@dibblego @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin Evidence.