@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin Tell me what haskell gets wrong in this regard. Do not fail.
-
@dibblego@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin My conclusion is that having an *enforced* single instance per type is arbitrary.
@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin You appear to be under-estimating how many instances per type there really are. Because, so what?
-
-
@dibblego@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin I never stipulated an upper-bound. My point is simply that *claiming* an upper-bound of 1 is absurd -
@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin That's the entire point of a TC. There are so many more implementation than you are thinking of. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.