@djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin Show me an improvement and don't fail extremely hard. A little bit would be nice.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin An improvement to Control.Lens? Or an improvement to typeclasses?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin Tell me what haskell gets wrong in this regard. Do not fail.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin I’ve already listed a trivial example which proves the distinction is arbitrary.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin No, you really haven't. And worse, not even close.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin Yes, I really have. Do you want me to instead show a type that has more than one valid Monad?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin Yes, because I can't think of one and that will totally demonstrate your point!6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin In sbt, if you limit the category of types to a particular subset, there's Initialize[_]4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jsuereth
@jsuereth@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin This doesn't mean multiple instances per type is a good idea (au contraire).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@djspiewak@nuttycom@jdegoes@milessabin That's a point I could listen to.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jsuereth @djspiewak @nuttycom @jdegoes @milessabin I agree. I stepped in to defend Kris actually but yeah interesting points come up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.