@dibblego it doesn't erase enough!
It's funny when Java users complain about type erasure, which is the only thing Java got right, while ignoring all the things it got wrong.
-
-
-
@copumpkin Moar arayshur!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@dibblego Why is type erasure right? -
@cbarrett In general, because I get huge benefits (e.g. parametricity) and nil cost (alleged cost is a limit of imagination). - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh except generic arrays.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jordanterrell I find this popular claim funny. Also it is wrong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jordanterrell@dibblego actually, it is mostly unimportant, apart from primitive specialisation, which is still mostly unimportantThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@dibblego@copumpkin if you have time, could you elaborate a little here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20918650/why-javas-type-erasure-is-a-good-thing … ? :) thanks.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jordanterrell@jedws@dibblego that's a typo. You wrote "type erasure" when you meant to write "everything".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.