@solidsnack @dibblego If it turns out you do this often enough to impact your code, something is wrong with it ;)
-
-
Replying to @alexey_r4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @sanshibanrei
@solidsnack@dibblego ... Well, Scala at least doesn't have Haskell's problems with head, where you don't get a stack trace and there's ...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sanshibanrei
@solidsnack@alexey_r Well-behaved would be removing List#head from the API. Aim higher.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sanshibanrei
@solidsnack@alexey_r "A bad API exists. Let's make them all difficult to use and horrible!" This is called Ruby Reasoning and I reject it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @sanshibanrei
@solidsnack@alexey_r The language and type system can do a lot better *in every possible case*. Convince me why we should do it so awfully?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@solidsnack @alexey_r Because like (I hope) you said, it does not fail fast, among many reasons. Also, yes, it generalises and safely.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.