every time you see "monad", replace it with "statement" and then you will understand everything and not understand what the fuss is about
-
-
@techtangents@dibblego math without intuitive analogies is useful, right?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andreypopp
@andreypopp@techtangents "monad is a statement" is not even an analogy let alone intuitive. It's ridiculous to the highest degree.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@techtangents agree, that was@puffnfresh is misunderstanding me, but pure-math-speak-fans are worrysome1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andreypopp
@dibblego@techtangents@puffnfresh tbh, if terminology originated from math ≠ terminology is good1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andreypopp
@andreypopp@techtangents@puffnfresh that is a very weird and irrelevant thing to say.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@techtangents@puffnfresh I guess this is the root of our disagreement, I personally feel math terminology is broken [...]2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@andreypopp @techtangents @puffnfresh I have absolutely no idea why you are telling me this, let alone why you think it is true.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.