Tony Morris

@dibblego @bvenners I don't disagree but is there not some value to accessibility for those less versed in the library?

@mpilquist @bvenners naming obsession is an ineffective method to form valid concepts. This is why those who understand no longer obsess.

@dibblego @bvenners Not entirely convinced of the *complete* ineffectiveness of names but exposing the obsession is valuable IMO.

@mpilquist @bvenners They aren't completely ineffective. Just in the capacity that is often alleged, as in this case.

@dibblego @bvenners Agreed!

@mpilquist @dibblego You can have good types *and* good names.

@bvenners @mpilquist You keep saying "good names" as if you know what they are. You don't. This is the contention.

@dibblego @mpilquist Well, I at least know that this name is Good: http://doc.scalatest.org/2.0/#org.scalautils.Good … Hope you both have a Good(newYear).