Tony Morris

"We need a better name than monad because monad sounds too abstract

@puffnfresh in F# we call them computation expressions, but they can do some extra stuff

@rickasaurus @puffnfresh problem is F# misses the practical purpose of monads, to abstract on all monads.

@dibblego @puffnfresh it sort of separates the monadic type from the code rewriting machinery in an interesting way though.

@rickasaurus @puffnfresh if it is the insignificant, superficial detail left after removal of all practical purpose, what is interesting?

@dibblego @puffnfresh I think that's a bit unfair. F# had comprehensive async before haskell after all.