"We need a better name than monad because monad sounds too abstract
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh I think that's a bit unfair. F# had comprehensive async before haskell after all.
@rickasaurus @puffnfresh Haskell is not the point. F# completely misses the practical purpose of monads. Like C#.
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh you have to understand that F# is severely limited by the C#/CLR compatibility constraint -
@rickasaurus@puffnfresh Sure I understand that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh For example, we'd all very much like GATDs, but there's no obvious and fast way to implement them. -
@rickasaurus@puffnfresh in the meantime let's not point to F# as a practical implementation of the concept "monad." It's not. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.