"We need a better name than monad because monad sounds too abstract
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh it sort of separates the monadic type from the code rewriting machinery in an interesting way though.
@rickasaurus @puffnfresh if it is the insignificant, superficial detail left after removal of all practical purpose, what is interesting?
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh I think that's a bit unfair. F# had comprehensive async before haskell after all. -
@rickasaurus@puffnfresh Haskell is not the point. F# completely misses the practical purpose of monads. Like C#. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh and the integrating-haskell-with-other-platforms stories leaves a lot to be desired.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@dibblego@puffnfresh if there was a nicer bridge to .NET I would surely choose it more often.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.