Textual record of my “talk” tonight. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1679797/ScalaSyd/presentation.scala … Some fairly egregious typos in there, but the essence is right.
-
-
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak Was great. Thanks again. (Modules are still anti-modular) but great talk.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @markhibberd
@markhibberd@djspiewak Why are modules anti-modular? I hope functions aren't anti-functional!4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KenScambler
@KenScambler@markhibberd@djspiewak More concisely, that thing which is often called "modules", is anti-modular. Same for "functional."1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @dibblego1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@KenScambler@markhibberd Though, I've never seen a descr. of "module" which isn't in fact anti-modular. Scala, ML or otherwise.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@KenScambler@markhibberd It’s very difficult to exemplify this sort of thing though, because modularity benefits in the large.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @djspiewak
@djspiewak@KenScambler@markhibberd I'd like to see a benefit in modularity for no penalty. Instead I see no modularity with huge penalty.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@djspiewak@KenScambler@markhibberd you can't reuse the carburetor alone though (don't you love metaphores :-)?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@etorreborre @djspiewak @KenScambler @markhibberd I especially hate metaphors when they are used to parody an actually useful objective.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.