@samth @bitemyapp @puffnfresh @djspiewak I am compelling you to PLEASE show me where I am wrong. This is my position until such time.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak I (a) know type theory (b) regularly willingly eschew types. Types are an SE tool w/ tradeoffs.3 replies 4 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Not goading, genuinely curious: what are some resources for learning about the tradeoffs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deech
@deech@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Similar to tradeoff of any tool My research covers this, also see: http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/PL/druby/ …2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@deech@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak this is not a trade. Type holes do exactly the same.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak -- type holes do not provide the same experience as, say, a smalltalk-80 environment.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @coreload
@coreload@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Agreed. Type holes is a far more robust experience.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak -- it's a tradeoff. I don't need the extra robustness as much as I need the expressivenes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @coreload
@coreload@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak You lose robustness as well as expressiveness. Show me the advantage please.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak - compare something like Cloud Haskell with something like Gemstone Smalltalk replication2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@coreload @samth @bitemyapp @puffnfresh @djspiewak I am genuinely curious of increased expressiveness or unfamiliarity of prob structure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.