@samth @bitemyapp @puffnfresh @djspiewak demonstrate it to be false, because otherwise it is a well understood expedience of many.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Telling your interlocutors that they don't themselves exist is unlikely to be persuasive.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @samth
@samth@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak I am compelling you to PLEASE show me where I am wrong. This is my position until such time.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak I (a) know type theory (b) regularly willingly eschew types. Types are an SE tool w/ tradeoffs.3 replies 4 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Not goading, genuinely curious: what are some resources for learning about the tradeoffs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deech
@deech@dibblego@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@djspiewak Similar to tradeoff of any tool My research covers this, also see: http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/PL/druby/ …2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @samth
@samth@deech@dibblego@puffnfresh@djspiewak What is it winning you exactly to not leverage types?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@samth@dibblego@puffnfresh@djspiewak Maybe simplistic, but how about hot-swapping code at runtime without a re-compile?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deech
@deech@bitemyapp@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak What is that to do with type systems?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@bitemyapp@samth@puffnfresh@djspiewak I thought you couldn't add a function of a different type at run-time, eg.#haskell.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@deech @bitemyapp @samth @puffnfresh @djspiewak Haskell can do it; just nobody does because it is a bad idea. Always a better way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.