@puffnfresh @davetchepak because most of my bugs are about incorrect algorithms, logic shortcomings, etc. not about number vs string.
-
-
Replying to @getify
@getify@davetchepak types can do more than just distinguish strings/numbers. If you're at#yow13, quickly talk to@dibblego or@djspiewak.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak More to the point, I'll ask for a non-trivial program and watch you type error over and over.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak algorithms my ass.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak I agree, nobody seriously looks at types and says, "don't need that."2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@puffnfresh@getify@davetchepak@djspiewak nobody that really *knows* anything about types willingly eschews them.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp
@bitemyapp Not sure I agree with that one. John Hughes does a lot of Erlang.@dibblego@puffnfresh@davetchepak5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nvanderw
@nvanderw@bitemyapp@dibblego@puffnfresh@davetchepak doing Erlang do to work reasons is not the same as fav'ing a language1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @old_sound
@old_sound@nvanderw@bitemyapp@puffnfresh@davetchepak totally agree. Haskell is by far not a fav, just often most practical.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@davetchepak The one in my head and it looks nothing like Haskell.
-
-
Replying to @dibblego
@dibblego@davetchepak what is stopping it from becoming a thing? Just curious. It would be interesting to see :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @relrod6
@relrod6@davetchepak laziness and dissatisfaction with my current thoughts.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.